home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
-
- OSI-X400ops Working Group [OPS-7] E. Stefferud
- [draft-ietf-x400ops-admd-01.txt] Network Management Associates
- 2 February 1993
-
-
- Assertion of C=US; A=IMX
-
- draft-ietf-x400ops-admd-01.txt
-
- Expires 16 July 1993
-
-
- 1. Status of this Memo
-
- This document is an Internet Draft. Internet Drafts are working
- documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its Areas,
- and its Working Groups. Note that other groups may also distribute
- working documents as Internet Drafts.
-
- Internet Drafts are valid for a maximum of six months and may be
- updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. (The
- file 1id-abstracts.txt on nic.ddn.mil describes the current status of
- each Internet Draft.) It is not appropriate to use Internet Drafts as
- reference material or to cite them other than as a "work in progress".
-
- NOTE: This is a "prestandards working draft" that will hopefully
- progress to Proposed Standard in some reasonable time frame.
- At that time, this note will be removed.
-
-
- 2. Abstract
-
- This (draft) document establishes an Internet Based X.400
- Administrative Management Domain (ADMD) with the name "A=IMX", for use
- in the United States of America (C=US), according to the applicable
- rules of CCITT Recommendations and ISO Standards, and in keeping with
- existing regulatory practices in the United States of America. It
- also establishes a naming authority under the Internet Assigned
- Numbers Authority (IANA) to register and openly publish Private
- Management Domain (PRMD) names subordinate to A=IMX under C=US.
-
- NOTE: Other countries may or may not take similar actions, at their
- sovereign discretion. How C=US and other Internet based ADMD
- operations in other countries should or should not be
- coordinated is not addressed in this document.
-
- NOTE: Any chosen C=US ADMD name is a matter of arbitrary choice as long
- as it does not conflict with any other choice of ADMD name by
- any other ADMD Service Provider operating in association with
- C=US. (See APPENDIX A for more discussion of name selection.)
-
- Stefferud Document Expiration: 16 July 1993 [Page 1]
-
- Internet-Draft Assertion of C=US; A=IMX 2 February 1992
-
-
- 3. Introduction
-
- X.400/ISO/IEC 10021 are the International Telegraph and Telephone
- Consultative Committee (CCITT) identifier for a set of Message
- Handling System (MHS) Recommendations [X.400] and the ISO/IEC
- identifier for the matching ISO/IEC Standard [10021] which many
- organizations in the Internet community wish to deploy for the purpose
- of exchanging messages.
-
- Working within X.400 specifications, this document establishes and
- names the required Internet ADMD to meet X.400 infrastructure needs.
-
- The X.400 Recommendations call for a specific naming and addressing
- infrastructure consisting of Administrative Management Domain (ADMD)
- entities within each sovereign Country (C), where each ADMD must have
- an unambiguous name within a given country and where each ADMD then
- becomes a naming authority for the registration of unambiguous names
- of Private Management Domain (PRMD) entities, whose name values are
- subordinate to the ADMD which serves as their PRMD naming authority.
-
- In combination, the set of domain attributes, with their associated
- name values, constitute tagged attribute=value pairs which can be used
- to form ORAddresses (e.g., C=US; A=IMX; P=SOME-NAME; O=COMPANY;
- OU=Sales) [X.411, Figure 2, Part 30 of 41].
-
- This document, is only concerned with ADMD and PRMD levels. All
- levels below PRMD are a local matter within each PRMD.
-
- 3.1. X.400 Requirements on ADMD and PRMD Names
-
- ADMD and PRMD Name values are limited by the X.400 Recommendations to
- a maximum length of 16 PrintableString characters [X.411, Figure B-1
- (Part 2 of 3)]. Case, multiple white space characters, and leading or
- trailing white spaces are all non-distinguishing for purposes of
- matching [F.401, Section 5.3].
-
- The PrintableString character set is essentially US-ASCII without:
-
- @ atsign
- ! exclamation point (bang)
- % percent sign
- _ underscore
- " double quote
-
- Specifically, PrintableString is a subset of International Alphabet
- Number 5 (IA5), shown in this table copied from [X.208, Table 5].
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Stefferud Document Expiration: 16 July 1993 [Page 2]
-
- Internet-Draft Assertion of C=US; A=IMX 2 February 1992
-
-
- ______________________________
- Name Graphic
- ______________________________
- Capital letters A,B,...Z
- Small letters a,b,...z
- Digits 0,1,...9
- Space (space)
- Apostrophe '
- Left parentheses (
- Right parentheses )
- Plus sign +
- Comma ,
- Hyphen -
- Full stop .
- Solidus /
- Colon :
- Equal sign =
- Question mark ?
- ______________________________
- Source: CCITT X.208, Table 5
-
-
- 3.2. Relationship to Domain Name System (DNS)
-
- The X.400 naming scheme has certain similarities to the Internet
- Domain Naming System (DNS) [DNS], which is also global and
- hierarchical with distribution of naming authority to entities at each
- subordinate level in the naming tree. Many thousands of names have
- already been registered in the DNS. The DNS coincidentally uses the
- same international register of country codes (ISO 3166 two-character
- codes) for its top level names (e.g,. US and GB), except that the DNS
- also includes UK for interesting historical reasons, and includes some
- three character top level domain names. Currently, these are COM,
- EDU, GOV, INT, MIL, NET, and ORG.
-
- It is not known whether or not additional three character top level
- names will be added to the DNS. It is known that additional two
- character country codes will be added to ISO 3166 and to the DNS.
-
- DNS names are limited to 64 characters of USASCII letters (A-Z),
- digits (0-9), hyphen (-) and dot (.), with dot restricted to use as a
- constructive delimiter between concatenated names from ascending DNS
- levels. Case is non-distinguishing for purposes of matching.
- Embedded white space is not allowed. Leading and trailing white space
- is ignored for purposes of matching.
-
-
- 4. Name of the C=US Internet ADMD
-
- The name of the C=US Internet ADMD is "IMX".
-
-
-
- Stefferud Document Expiration: 16 July 1993 [Page 3]
-
- Internet-Draft Assertion of C=US; A=IMX 2 February 1992
-
-
- 5. PRMD Names in C=US; A=IMX
-
- PRMD Name Registration is accomplished by overt application to the
- IANA registration agent by the registrant. A registration form will
- be supplied by the IANA registration agent. All IANA registered PRMD
- names will be openly published by the IANA for public access.
-
- To align with CCITT X.402 and ISO/IEC 10021-2, the IANA registrar
- shall not register the name values of "single-space" [X.402, Section
- 18.3.1] or a single zero (0). [CCITT-MHS, Section 3.2.3]
-
- All IANA registered PRMD names are assumed to be the rightful
- intellectual property of the registration applicant, but may be
- subject to legal challenge of the applicant's right to use the name at
- any time. The IANA takes no position with regard to the legal "right
- to use" of any registered name, and leaves resolution of any challenge
- to the challenge parties, which may or may not involve litigation. In
- the event of challenge to any registered PRMD name, the IANA only
- records in its register the result of whatever resolution may occur,
- upon notification of the resolution by the registrant or by some other
- authority with proper jurisdiction.
-
-
- 5.1. Sources of PRMD Registered Names
-
- PRMD names registered by the IANA under A=IMX are drawn from
-
- (i) names already registered in the DNS naming tree, or
-
- (ii) any other name that is guaranteed not to conflict with
- any other IANA registered PRMD name under C=US; A=IMX,
- or any current or possible future DNS name.
-
- Examples of (i) are:
-
- P=nma.com; P=nri.reston.va.us; P=nic.ddn.mil; P=nsf.gov; P=sintef.no
-
- NOTE: There is no reason to disallow C=US; A=IMX; P=sintef.no if
- sintef.no wishes to so register. Therefore it is not proscribed.
-
- The key requirement is that a PRMD name must be an unambiguous string
- of permitted characters uniquely registered to a single owner under
- the registering ADMD, so any existing DNS name with 16 or fewer
- characters under any DNS top level domain may be used as a PRMD name
- in C=US; A=IMX because all such DNS names are already unambiguous and
- uniquely assigned to registrants by the IANA in the Internet DNS, and
- they only contain allowed characters.
-
- This is a secondary use of a DNS name. If a name is ever removed from
- the DNS for any reason, then it must also be removed from the IANA
- PRMD name register, if it is so registered. DNS names are not
- automatically registered as PRMD names.
-
- Stefferud Document Expiration: 16 July 1993 [Page 4]
-
- Internet-Draft Assertion of C=US; A=IMX 2 February 1992
-
-
- Examples of (ii) are:
-
- P=ESnet; P=NASA; P=IBM; P=Boeing; P=XYZZY; P=CALTRANS
-
- All such names must not conflict with any possible current or future
- DNS name that may or may not ever be registered.
-
-
- 5.2. Proscribed PRMD Names
-
- The following PRMD Names are proscribed:
-
- <> Any PRMD name that is also registered in the DNS, unless it is
- registered in the DNS by the same registration applicant.
-
- <> Any PRMD name that ends in a dot (.) followed by any 3
- characters of the kind allowed in DNS top-level domain names,
- unless also registered in the DNS by the same registration
- applicant.
-
- <> Any PRMD name that ends in a dot (.) followed by any two
- characters of the kind allowed in DNS top level domain names,
- unless also registered in the DNS by the same registration
- applicant.
-
-
- 6. Operation of C=US; A=IMX
-
- Operating rules for elements of the X.400 Mail Transfer System (MTS)
- in the Internet are not addressed in this document.
-
- The rules for interconnection of A=IMX with PRMDs other ADMDs are not
- addressed in this document.
-
-
- 7. Security Considerations
-
- This document does not address any aspect of security. It neither
- exacerbates nor reduces any security problems or risks that are
- already inherent in X.400 technologies or deployed systems.
-
-
- 8. Expiration of this Internet Draft
-
- This Internet Draft Expires 16 July 1992
-
-
- 9. References
-
-
- [X.208] CCITT Recommendation X.208, 1988,
- Specification of Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1)
-
- Stefferud Document Expiration: 16 July 1993 [Page 5]
-
- Internet-Draft Assertion of C=US; A=IMX 2 February 1992
-
-
-
- [X.400] CCITT Recommendation X.400, 1988,
- Message Handling System and Service Overview.
-
-
- [10021] ISO/IEC 10021-1, 1988, Information Processing Systems --
- Text Communication -- MOTIS -- System and Service
- Overview.
-
-
- [F.401] CCITT Recommendation F.400, 1988,
- Naming and Addressing for Public Message handling Services.
-
-
- [X.402] CCITT Recommendation X.402, 1988,
- Message Handling Systems: Overall Architecture.
-
- ISO/IEC 10021-2, 1988, Information Processing Systems --
- Text Communication -- MOTIS -- Overall Architecture,
-
-
- [X.411] CCITT Recommendation X.411, 1988,
- Message Handling Systems: Message Transfer System:
- Abstract Service Definition and Procedures.
-
- ISO/IEC 10021-4, 1988, Information Processing Systems --
- Text Communication -- MOTIS -- Message Transfer System:
- Abstract Service Definition and Procedures.
-
-
- [MHS] CCITT MHS, March 1992, Implementors' Guide, Version 8 [1988]
-
-
- [ASCII] Coded Character Set--7-Bit American Standard Code
- for Information Interchange, ANSI X3.4-1986.
-
-
- [DNS] Paul V. Mockapetris. Domain Names -- Concepts and
- Facilities. Request for Comments 1034, DDN Network
- Information Center, SRI International, November 1987.
-
-
-
- 10. Author's Address
-
- Einar A. Stefferud Telephone: +1 714 842 3711
- Network Management Associates, Inc. Facsimile: +1 714 848 2091
- 10301 Drey Lane Internet: Stef@nma.com
- Huntington Beach, CA 92647-5615, USA
-
-
-
-
- Stefferud Document Expiration: 16 July 1993 [Page 6]
-
- Internet-Draft Assertion of C=US; A=IMX 2 February 1992
-
-
- 11. APPENDIX A: Discussion of Name Value Chosen for INTERNET
- ADMD Attribute Name Value in C=US.
-
-
- NOTE: If and when this Internet Draft is finally adopted as a Proposed
- Standard, this Appendix may be removed.
-
- DISCUSSION:
-
- The name value of "A=IMX" has been arbitrarily chosen because it is
- short and suggests the idea of mail exchange, but it is not an acronym
- for and specific set of words. It is just an easily remembered,
- easily typed set of characters without any assigned meaning.
-
- It is required to obtain consensus for this choice name from the IETF,
- the IAB, and the Internet Society and then the right to legal use of
- the name must be established in the United States of America. Prior
- versions of this document have attempted to use other names, but each
- was found to be troublesome in some serious way.
-
- Choosing a name for something like an ADMD is a political issue, and
- requires consideration of the rights of others to use the chosen name.
-
- In the Internet, it is not yet clear who should act to secure legal
- rights to the use of a selected name.
-
- This document has been developed to lay the technical groundwork
- without getting hung up on the political/legal/administrative issues
- of name establishment.
-
- With adoption of this document as the working basis for C=US ADMD and
- PRMD name registration, we should next be able to progress on to legal
- action to secure the right to use the chosen name.
-
- <Single-Space> is not available for Internet use in C=US, in that it
- is reserved by the [CCITT X.400 | ISO MOTIS] [Recommendations |
- Standards] for the name of a virtual ADMD that is to be approved by
- some National Body in C=US. That National Body appears to be the FCC.
- This issue is of no concern to the IETF, IAB, or ISOC as long as we do
- not attempt to use the proscribed name.
-
- We should not seek approval of any C=US National Body in the
- establishment of an Internet ADMD in C=US. No other ADMD has sought
- nor obtained any such approval, and thus the precedent has been set
- for the C=US Internet community to self assert its ADMD status.
-
- All other ADMD Service Providers have unilaterally established the
- ADMD names they are using, without asking permission from anyone, but
- also with care taken to avoid collision with a name chosen by any
- other C=US ADMD.
-
-
- Internet-Draft Assertion of C=US; A=IMX 2 February 1992
- Stefferud Document Expiration: 16 July 1993 [Last Page]
-